3 min read
2026 Spotlight: Emerging Carbon Removal Technologies to Watch
ResourceWise
:
Jan 21, 2026 10:55:02 AM
As decarbonization strategies mature across energy, industry, and transportation, attention is increasingly shifting beyond emissions reduction alone toward carbon dioxide removal (CDR). While emissions abatement remains essential, most long-term climate pathways now assume a growing role for technologies that can actively remove CO₂ from the atmosphere.
The challenge is that the CDR market is still forming. Standards are evolving, technologies vary widely in maturity, and a clear gap remains between long-term climate ambition and near-term deployment.
As 2026 approaches, several CDR pathways are beginning to stand out. These technologies are worth close attention as markets, policies, and corporate demand take shape.
A Market Moving from Concept to Early Deployment
Across the CDR landscape, momentum is building unevenly. Some technologies remain highly experimental. Others are advancing through pilots, early commercial projects, and long-term offtake agreements.
Key factors shaping which technologies are gaining traction include:
- Technical readiness and scalability
- Cost per ton today versus long-term cost
- Ability to verify permanence and additionality
- Alignment with existing infrastructure and industrial systems
- Compatibility with emerging standards and procurement frameworks
Against this backdrop, biogenic CO₂ removal has emerged as one of the most practical near-term pathways. But it is far from the only one drawing attention.
Biogenic CO₂ Removal: A Leading Near-Term Pathway
Biogenic CO₂ removal refers to capturing and permanently storing carbon dioxide released from biological sources, including:
- Biomass Combustion
- Fermentation
- Pulp and Paper Processing
- Waste-to-Energy Facilities
Because this carbon was recently absorbed from the atmosphere through photosynthesis, capturing and storing it results in net-negative emissions.
This principle underpins several biogenic CDR pathways now gaining market traction:
- Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS)
- Carbon Capture at Pulp and Paper Mills
- Biochar Production with Long-Term Soil Sequestration
- Fermentation-Based CO₂ Capture at Ethanol and Bioprocessing Facilities
What makes biogenic pathways particularly relevant for 2026 is their connection to existing industrial operations. Concentrated CO₂ streams, established feedstock supply chains, and known operating profiles reduce technical risk and allow projects to scale incrementally rather than relying on greenfield deployment.
Read More: Biochar: Huge Potential in Biofuels and Renewable Energy
Why Biogenic Pathways Are Advancing Faster
Recent market activity suggests that biogenic CO₂ removal is moving beyond theory into early commercial reality. Several dynamics are driving this progress:
- Cost Advantage: Biogenic pathways generally sit lower on the cost curve than more capital-intensive options like direct air capture.
- Infrastructure Readiness: Many facilities already emit biogenic CO₂ in concentrated forms, simplifying capture.
- Corporate Demand: Buyers seeking high-quality, durable removals are signing long-term offtake agreements.
- Clearer Carbon Accounting: Biogenic removals often offer more straightforward lifecycle emissions accounting than avoidance-based credits.
High-profile deals in biochar and pulp-and-paper-based removals have helped validate these pathways and signal confidence to developers and investors.
Beyond Biogenic: Other CDR Technologies to Watch
While biogenic CO₂ removal is currently leading early deployment, it represents only one part of a broader and increasingly diverse CDR ecosystem. Other technologies gaining attention include:
- Direct Air Capture (DAC): Highly durable but currently higher cost and energy-intensive.
- Enhanced Weathering: Early-stage but potentially scalable using existing materials flows.
- Ocean-Based Removal: Technically complex, with evolving scientific and regulatory scrutiny.
- Mineralization and Geological Storage: Offering permanence but dependent on site-specific conditions.
Each pathway presents a different balance of scalability, cost, permanence, and maturity. The emerging consensus is that no single technology will meet future removal needs alone. Instead, 2026 is shaping up as a year where the relative roles of different CDR approaches become clearer.
Constraints That Will Shape 2026 Outcomes
Despite growing momentum, CDR technologies face shared constraints that will influence which pathways scale first:
- Competition for biomass and other inputs
- Geographic limitations tied to feedstocks and storage
- Evolving standards for measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV)
- Policy uncertainty around incentives, transport, and long-term liability
These challenges highlight why market transparency and credible data will be essential as buyers, developers, and policymakers evaluate competing approaches.
What This Means for the Renewables and Low-Carbon Economy
For renewable energy, biofuels, forestry, and industrial sectors, emerging CDR technologies represent more than climate tools. They are becoming strategic assets.
Facilities historically viewed as emissions sources are being reassessed for their removal potential. The shift means implications for investment strategy, asset valuation, and long-term contracting.
As markets develop, organizations that understand how technology readiness, feedstocks, policy frameworks, and carbon accounting intersect will be better positioned to navigate uncertainty and capture early value.
Looking Across 2026
Carbon removal will not scale overnight, but the signals are becoming clearer. Biogenic CO₂ removal is likely to remain a near-term leader, while other technologies continue to mature and compete for future relevance.
For stakeholders across the renewables sector, the key question heading into 2026 is no longer whether CDR will play a role. It’s about which technologies will move first, under what conditions, and at what scale.


