As the aviation sector races toward its 2050 net-zero target, Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) has emerged as its most immediate and scalable decarbonization tool. Across Europe, North America, and Asia, governments are introducing SAF blending mandates that require airlines to use a set percentage of SAF in their fuel mix.
But as the International Air Transport Association (IATA) recently cautioned, mandates without meaningful incentives risk doing more harm than good.
Incentives refer to financial or policy mechanisms that help close the cost gap between SAF and conventional jet fuel. Because SAF is still more expensive to produce, governments often use incentives such as tax credits, production subsidies, grants, carbon pricing mechanisms, or preferential loan programs to encourage investment and scale.
These measures de-risk early projects, attract private capital, and signal long-term policy support. They give producers the confidence to expand capacity. Without them, SAF supply remains limited, prices stay high, and blending mandates become far harder to achieve.
For airlines already operating under tight margins, compulsory blending at current SAF prices could strain finances, stall progress, and slow the broader clean-fuel transition. The question isn’t whether mandates are necessary. Instead, it’s whether they can succeed alone.
SAF is a low-carbon, drop-in replacement for jet fuel derived from renewable feedstocks like used cooking oil, animal fats, and agricultural residues. When properly produced, SAF can cut lifecycle CO₂ emissions by up to 80% compared to conventional jet fuel.
Despite years of progress, SAF supply remains minuscule relative to aviation’s total fuel demand of less than 0.3% globally. This scarcity stems from limited feedstock availability, high production costs, and a still-emerging infrastructure for collection, refining, and certification.
At the same time, policy momentum is accelerating. The EU’s ReFuelEU Aviation initiative will require airlines to use 2% SAF by 2025, rising to 70% by 2050. The US Inflation Reduction Act provides tax credits for SAF producers under the 40B and forthcoming 45Z schemes, though rollout remains uneven.
Across Asia, several governments are pursuing domestic mandates as they aim to secure energy resilience and local feedstock markets.
But while mandates can create demand, they can’t guarantee supply (or affordability).
Mandates Without Incentives: The Structural Problem
On paper, blending mandates sound simple: require airlines to buy SAF, and producers will have a guaranteed market. In practice, the economics are far more complex.
SAF production capacity is still measured in millions, not billions, of liters. Feedstocks such as used cooking oil (UCO) and animal fats are finite and already in demand from the renewable diesel sector.
Building new refineries takes years and substantial capital investment. Without incentives to de-risk early projects, developers hesitate to expand.
SAF currently costs two to five times more than conventional jet fuel. Airlines forced to meet blending requirements must absorb these costs, often without being able to pass them on to consumers in price-sensitive markets.
This undermines competitiveness and could disincentivize participation in voluntary decarbonization programs.
Inconsistent policy frameworks across regions add further uncertainty. While the EU leans on mandates, the US favors incentive mechanisms. Meanwhile, emerging markets are experimenting with both.
For airlines operating globally, this patchwork approach makes compliance more complex and less predictable.
In short: mandates create demand, but incentives enable supply. Without a dual-track approach, the system tilts toward cost inflation rather than innovation.
Incentives such as production tax credits, carbon pricing schemes, or offtake guarantees can bridge the cost gap between SAF and fossil jet fuel. They help de-risk investment, attract private capital, and accelerate commercialization of new feedstock and conversion technologies.
Where strong incentive frameworks exist, SAF projects are scaling faster. In the United States, the SAF Grand Challenge aims for three billion gallons of annual production by 2030 supported by targeted credits and research funding.
In contrast, in regions relying solely on mandates, producers often struggle to finance projects due to uncertain return on investment.
Beyond economics, incentives also encourage feedstock diversification. This includes everything from agricultural residues and waste oils to next-generation sources like municipal solid waste (MSW) and algae. This diversification is crucial to maintaining long-term sustainability and avoiding indirect land-use impacts.
Europe offers a glimpse of what happens when mandates outpace incentives. Under ReFuelEU Aviation, airlines must blend rising shares of SAF regardless of cost or availability.
The result means pressure on limited European feedstock pools and higher fuel prices for carriers. Many of such carriers have voiced concerns that the policy could disadvantage regional operators versus long-haul competitors.
Meanwhile, countries such as the Netherlands and Finland are working to balance the equation by supporting domestic SAF producers with grant funding, carbon accounting frameworks, and early purchase agreements. These measures aim to prevent mandates from turning into unfunded obligations.
As policies evolve, carbon intensity (CI) scoring is emerging as a key differentiator in SAF economics. Fuels with verifiably lower lifecycle emissions are eligible for more lucrative credits and higher market value.
This creates a new layer of competition from both SAF producers and among feedstocks and technologies. Those who can demonstrate verified low-CI performance stand to capture premiums in both compliance and voluntary carbon markets.
However, establishing robust monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) systems requires significant upfront investment. Again, this is an area where incentives will play a vital role.
The path forward isn’t mandates or incentives… it’s both. Mandates provide the demand certainty producers need. Incentives provide the financial runway for supply to catch up.
Policymakers must design frameworks that phase incentives in parallel with mandate escalation. Doing so ensures market maturity and price stabilization.
For airlines, this means engaging early with governments and suppliers to align compliance strategies, negotiate offtake agreements, and invest in credible emissions-tracking systems. For SAF developers, it highlights the value of data transparency and partnership with market intelligence providers that can navigate the emerging web of regional regulations and carbon value mechanisms.
SAF remains aviation’s most promising tool for near-term decarbonization. But mandates without incentives risk turbulence ahead.
Without targeted financial and structural support, the market could see supply shortfalls, inflated prices, and stalled investment.
Progress depends on alignment: mandates that create the pull, incentives that create the push. Only when both work together can the SAF market reach cruising altitude and deliver meaningful carbon reductions without grounding economic growth.
The pace of change in biofuels is accelerating. Understanding where feedstocks, policy, and technology intersect has never been more critical.
Gain actionable insight into emerging feedstock opportunities, regulatory trends, and data-backed pathways to a lower-carbon future. Download the eBook now.